Lets look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and builtin file site

Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type has the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.



Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not only a Webhard, it is a company.

It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.



Link hard solutions have emerged based on the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.

It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to build Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.

If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage plus the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, that can be fully built in Soho, so the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.



It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.



Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Online sites that allows one to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. Which means that the usage of web hard has become common.



But it's not just lately that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. The moment it came out, many people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon is the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a large portal, which also leads to security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.



In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, there are functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the cost of building a single server.



Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. p2p 순위 You can go over it and choose the right one in line with the reality and needs.